When having equipment types that are similiar, today you can either make a copy with the differences (hard to maintain) or for some cases making optional signals through the xml can be done.
What would be nice is to add an equipment type in another type, so that you can define a processvalue (PV) equipment type once, with trend / alarm and necessary tag structure once. Then in other equipment types instead of re-creating 10/15/20 times or however many signals you need, you paste the PV equipment type where most of the information is handled in that equipment type.
EquipmentType PV
processvalue with trend and alarm - no type
supporttag for alarmblocking - no type
EquipmentType Motor
PV1 - type PV
PV2 - type PV
CMD - no type
EquipmentType Motor_special
motor - type Motor
extrasignal1 - type PV
extrasignal2 - no type
|
Idea business value
|
|
| Idea priority | 4 – Important to my company |